(Here is the list of all web pages from this
server, arranged by language (in 8 languages).
Choose the page that interests you by
dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:)
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking on
"Menu 2".)
Here is the list of all my web pages from all servers.
These are arranged primarily by language
(i.e. as web pages in Polish,
English, German,
French, Spanish,
Italian, Greek, and
Russian.) For each language web pages are
arranged by their subjects.
Choose the page that interests you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking on
"Menu 4".)
In science it is called "simulation".
Namely, if scientists wish to get to
know better what actually happens
in some real situation, then they build
so-called "model" that can be researched.
This "model" simulates a given real
situation and also simulates processes
that take place in this situation.
Then scientists watch on this model
what actually does happen in there.
It can be noted that something
very strange happens in present
times with the entire human
civilisation. Many people begin
to ask "what
God
is doing that matters went so bad?"
So let us build on this web page a
"model" of God, and then let us "simulate"
putting ourselves into the situation
of God. Thus probably we are going
to notice what actually does happen
around us. This in turn is to provide
us with the answer as to whether God
really lost His control over humanity.
Or perhaps whatever we see happening
around us is simply caused by the
God's iron hand and by His strict
control over the goals and destines
that He already pre-planed for us.
Part #A:
Introductory information of this web page:
#A1.
What are goals of this web page:
The main goal of this web page is very
simple. Namely it depends on an attempt
to put ourselves in the situation of
God.
In turn, due to this putting ourselves in the
situation of God (or "simulating the God's
position"), we will attempt to understand
what actually does happen in the present
world, and thus what should be our role in
present events, how we should help God
by volunteering right roles for implementation,
and also what we should expect that most
probably it awaits us in a near future.
An additional goal of this web page is to make
the reader to realise several facts about God,
which facts directly result from the scientific
simulation of the situation of God. Because
the realising of these facts is an outcome of
the simulation of the God's situation, it does
not remove the free will from people who
learn about these facts. On the other hand,
such a scientific simulation gives the level
of correctness similar to the level that would
create a manifestation of God and His personal
summarising these facts to us. But simultaneously
the simulation is not as unambiguous and as
threatening as would be the perception of
a possible message from God Himself.
After all, a scientific simulation can be accepted,
rejected, or interpreted as anyone wishes -
means according to anyone's free will and
the anyone's philosophy of life.
#A2.
What motivated me to prepare this web page:
Practically each one of us is wondering
whether God does exist, whether we have
eternal soul, what is the goal of our existence,
what awaits the humanity in a near future,
how we should act in our lives, etc., etc.
I also belong to the group of people asking
this kind of questions. But there is a significant
difference between myself and others who ask.
After all, because I am a professional scientist,
I managed to find not only the answer to these
questions, but also identify a wealth of scientific
evidence which confirms that my answer is this
correct one.
Probably I am the only researcher on the Earth
who have found a key to the scientific understanding of
God
and to a rational getting to know this superior
being with the use of modern scientific methods.
This key turned out to be the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
It is because of this "theory of everything", that
I managed to determine where, when, and how
the self-evolution of God took place. Outcomes
of this determination are described in item #B1
of the web page
evolution.htm - about problems of natural evolution.
It is also because of this "theory of everything",
that I managed to formulate several formal scientific
proofs for the existence of God, soul, other world,
etc. These formal proofs are described:
in item #B3 of the web page
god.htm - with scientific answers of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions about God
(see in there the "formal scientific proof for
the existence of God"), in item #C1.1 of the web page
nirvana.htm - about the totaliztic nirvana
(see in there the "formal scientific proof for
the existence of eternal human soul"), in item
#D3 of the web page
dipolar_gravity.htm - about the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
(see in there the "formal scientific proof for
the existence of the counter-world"), and in
several further
totaliztic
web pages. Only because of findings of this
"theory of everything" I was also able to indicate
to other people an entire wealth of empirical
evidence for the existence of God, which (the
evidence) so-far was either overlooked, or
intentionally ignored by the official human
science. (Descriptions of this empirical
evidence are provided in items #F1 to
#F3 of the totaliztic web page
bible.htm - about the Bible authorised by God Himself.)
When formulating these formal scientific proofs
for the existence of God, and while researching
God with scientific methods, I had numerous
opportunities to have a close look at what would
happen if all people unanimously recognised my
proofs and rapidly started to believe (as strongly
as I do) that God in fact does exist. A positive
consequence of such a rapid converting of
all atheists into the belief in God would be,
of course, that almost instantly all people
would begin to act morally. Means, that would
disappear: crime, lies, cheating, killing, exploitation,
wars, etc., etc. However, in the present situation
of our civilisation, when people still just only
"worship God" instead of researching Him
and instead of obeying laws that He established,
various undesirable consequences of such
unanimous belief in God would also appear.
Namely, almost completely would then
diminish the accumulation of knowledge
and the human motivation to investigate
the universe. After all,
in present circumstances, for so-called
"typical bread eaters" the consequence
of being sure that God does exist is to
loose the motivations for investigating
and for analysing the world around us.
For every question about anything, for
these ones who strongly believe in God is
just a single reply, namely "because God
created it so and He controls it in just such
a manner". Believers in God notoriously
keep ignoring the well-known principle
that "God helps only those people who
help themselves", and that by failing to
act even saints get nowhere.
In order to summarise the above,
typical consequences
of increasing the faith in God in present
circumstances are: an increase in morality of people,
which is accompanied by the simultaneous decrease
in knowledge, disappearance of scientific research,
and the lack of motivation for creative searches.
Of course, if these are us who put ourselves in
the position of God, we would NOT like the situation
when all people believe in Us and all people worship
Us, when all people act morally, but simultaneously
the progress of knowledge and technology rapidly
falls down. After all, in such a situation the human
civilisation would never advance to a higher level
of development.
So in our interest as God, would lie finding a way
to inspire in people somehow the creative
searches and the increase in their knowledge.
As it turns out, this way depends on persuading some
people into the so-called "atheism". Atheists from the
very definition are forced to find out which mechanisms
hide behind events around them. After all, they
negate God as the source of these mechanisms.
As such, the "atheism" is the propelling force for
the progress of knowledge and for the technical
development of our civilisation. Unfortunately, the
"atheism" has this drawback, that it causes also
a moral decadency. This is because without believing
in the existence of God and without believing in
the existence of eternal soul, atheists try to gain
from the life as much as they only can for as little
as they manage to get away with. But since the
morality stands on their way, then to hell with the
morality. In order to summarise the above,
typical consequence
of "atheism" is the increase of knowledge and the fast
technical progress, which, however, is accompanied
by the simultaneous drop in the level of morality
amongst people.
Each one amongst two situations on the Earth described
before has its drawbacks. Namely, if all people
are believers in God, then the science, progress,
and motivations of people to improve their situation
would diminish on the Earth, while the average
level of morality would increase. In turn, if all people
on the Earth were atheists, then the science and
technology would bloom, while the morality would
fell down. The main reason is, that when something
undesirable affects believers in God, these typically
state that this is the "God's will" and do NOTHING
to improve their situation. In turn when something
undesirable affects atheists, then they try to determine
what is the reason for this and they fight with it.
So what God should do in order to make the humanity
to stay on the path of morality, but simultaneously people
keep motivations to continue research, progress, and
improvement of their situations. Well, on the present
level of human awareness the only choice is that
a correct balance between the number of people
who believe in God, and the number of atheists, must
be maintained on the Earth. Expressing this in
other words, if someone puts himself into the position
of God (means speaking scientifically - if someone
would "simulate the situation of God") then he would
discover easily that God to the same degree is
interested in a correctly balanced propagation
amongst present people both the "atheism" as
well as the "belief in God". In turn the best evidence
for this interest of God in a balanced propagation
of both, atheism and the belief in God, is the so-called
free will of people, and also the so-called
canon of ambiguity which God displays
in everything that He does. The "free will" which
God gave to all people causes that each one of
us has the right to interpret everything
on any way that he or she wishes. In turn the
"canon of ambiguity", which is embedded into
every action of God, depends on such doing
everything God decides to do, that every
person can interpret later this God's action
according to his or her own view of the world
and according to his or her personal philosophy -
means in any way that a given person wishes
to interpret it. (Please notice that descriptions
of the "canon of ambiguity" are provided in
subsection JB7.4 from volume 7 of monograph
[1/4].)
Unfortunately, the maintenance of the correct
balance on the Earth between the number of
atheists and the number of believers in God,
is immensely difficult. After all, people display
so-called "sheep mentality". Furthermore, on
the Earth works inertia, fashion, tradition, etc.
Therefore, every now and again this healthy
balance becomes disturbed. So what God does
in such cases. Well, he must take various
corrective measures. What these measures are
we already saw in the period of medieval times,
and we also are starting to see it in the present
time. After all, similarly like previously this
happened already once near the end of
antiquity, just recently again the disturbance
of this healthy balance took place.
In the result of this disturbed balance, the
number of atheists grew to the level that it
endangers the moral progress of humanity.
So God again must intervene, and in fact He
already intervenes. But He cannot appear
openly in the sky and start to electrocute atheists
with lightnings. After all this would destroy the
"free will" of people - and thus would force every
atheists to become a believer in God. In the
result another fall down of progress in knowledge
and technology would take place in the future
of the Earth. Therefore God have chosen
another method for restoration of the balance.
It is based on an old finding which is excellently
expressed by the proverb which states that
there are no atheists amongst frightened.
This method represents only a slight modification
of the method that God already used once
on the humanity during medieval times. In
a short run it is going to turn very painful for
individual people. But on a long run it is going
to turn very beneficial for the entire human
civilisation. This web page is going to try to
describe systematically and scientifically what
this method is all about. Furthermore, this page
shares with the reader my answers to questions
that are stated at the beginning of this item.
Part #B:
Goals which
God
posted for Himself for accomplishing:
#B1.
The "free will" - why God gave it to people:
If we consider this carefully, people have
access to several indicators which allow them
to deduce the intentions of God. One amongst
these indicators is the so-called "free will"
which people received from God. (Notice
that it is from this "free will" that the name
of this web page
will.htm
originates.) The "free will" is the right
to form and to adhere to any opinion on
every subject and to undertake actions
that are aligned with this opinion.
It is NOT difficult to deduce, that the right to a
"free will" given to people by God represents
simultaneously a very serious limitation which
tightens methods of God's action. After all, in
order to NOT break in people this "free will",
God is forced to act in a strictly defined manner.
It means, that whatever God does, He is forced
to do this in such a manner that every person
is later able to interpret this on his or her own
manner - means as he or she only wishes.
(This principle of highly ambiguous acting of
God is called the "canon of ambiguity" and it
is discussed more comprehensively in item
#C2 of this web page.) For example, if a view
that is spreading amongst people is NOT in a
long-term interest of God, then because of the
giving to people this "free will" God cannot
appear in clouds and hit with lightning bolts
all people who disseminate this inconvenient
view. After all, if God appear to people and
act in such a manner, then all people would
be so scared that they would loose the "free
will" and would start to do exactly what God
ordered them to do. Of course, there must
exist a very important reason for which God
for the good of His own interests decided to
impose on Himself these additional limitations
in order to give a "free will" to people. If one
analyses the matter thoroughly, this reason
can be deduced. Namely, people received
this right to "free will" from
God,
because God needs the inspirational variety
of human opinions on every subject. In turn
this variety of different opinions can be
important for God only in case when the
most important goal of God is to increase His
knowledge.
#B2.
The intellectual development of the universe - means one amongst the most important goals which
God
tries to accomplish through the creation of mankind:
Our simulation of intentions of God carried
out in previous item #B1 allows to establish
that "the most important goal of God is to
increase His knowledge", and thus to
develop intellectually the intelligent universe.
What even more interesting, this goal explains
also exactly what God created the physical
world and man. After all, if God alone tries
to increase His knowledge about the universe,
then in His lonely search for knowledge He
would overlook a huge number of interesting
aspects. This is because with knowledge is
like with discussion on any topic. Means
when we alone consider any topic, then
it looks much poorer than when this topic
is discussed constructively with other people.
So if we consider the existence of man from the
point of view of the intellectual development of
the universe being the most vital goal of God,
then man turns out to be a kind of "God's technician"
who prepares future objects of research. Of
course, this role of man in plans of God places
a series of requirements onto the humanity.
In turn these requirements could be met, God
is forced to direct the development of man in
a strictly defined manner.
Of course, the gathering knowledge is NOT the
only reason for which God created man. A whole
array of almost the same vital reasons for creating
humans by God is listed and explained in item
#C5 from the totaliztic web page
soul_proof.htm.
#B3.
Mankind - means working ants to which
God
entrusted cleaning the complex outlines
of knowledge that are hidden amongst
shadows of possible overlooking:
If we ask ourselves the question "why ancient
people did not build a gun or a glider", then
the most vital reason for this would turn the
lack of awareness that a gun or a glider
can exist. In other words, in order to increase
one's knowledge in any area, one firstly
needs to be aware that such an area of
knowledge does exist at all. So if this
finding we extrapolate to the situation
in which is God, then in order God is
able to continually increase His knowledge,
firstly people must exist which are to realise
to God that such new areas of knowledge
do exist at all - so that God then can increase
His knowledge in these areas.
Let us illustrate the above in more picturesque
manner. If we look with e.g. God's eyes at still
not researched area of unknown, then this
area resembles a "black mass" inside of which
hides a complicated "white skeleton of knowledge".
So in order this "white skeleton of knowledge"
is revealed to eyes of God, there is a need for
a sworn of laborious ants, which are to pounce
onto this "black mass of unknown" and gradually
"eat" all shadows which hide the knowledge.
People are performing for God just such a
role of "sworn of laborious ants" which gradually
reveal a complicated skeleton of knowledge
hidden inside of the black mass of unknown.
#B4.
Which evidence confirms claims of the
philosophy of totalizm
formulated on basis of findings from the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
that "the reason for which
God
created people is easier, safer, faster, and
more accurate getting to know Himself,
as well as the increase of knowledge and
perfection of God":
In item #C1 of totaliztic web page
god.htm - with scientific answers of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions regarding God
it was explained that the getting to know
Himself and the increase of His knowledge,
is the main reason why God created the
physical world and man. Of course, totalizm
developed this tradition, that whatever it states
it always provides also for this the appropriate evidence
and logical deductions which reveal in what
manner and on what basis totalizm reached
a given conclusion. This is so, because only
through presenting evidence in support of
its claims and also presenting the logic
behind its deductions, totalizm is able to
give to its followers the possibility to verify
the truth of its statements. So let us now
carry out the review of logics and evidence
that stands behind the statements of the
philosophy of totalizm that "God created
man in order to increase the knowledge
of God - especially this part of knowledge
which portraits the God's own attributes
and behaviours".
1.
Our knowledge of so-called "relative imperfection"
of God. This "relative imperfection of God"
is explained more comprehensively in item #M1
of the web page
evolution.htm - about the process of evolution.
(e.g. see the quotation from the Biblical Book of
Genesis 18:20-21, in which God openly admits,
that He does NOT know everything). In turn the
fact, that also God continually learns and improves
his methods of action, is additionally confirmed
by deductions and evidence presented in item
#D5 of the totaliztic web page
newzealand_visit.htm.
But because the comprehensive understanding
of this "relative imperfection" of God is also
a prerequisite for understanding and
acceptance of explanations from this web page,
I am going to summarise here briefly what is the
essence of this "relative imperfection" of God.
Let us begin from the primitive concept-word of
"imperfection". This highly imprecise concept
was introduced by people in order to describe
some people and some products of human
activities. As such, it is highly inadequate for
describing the superior being of the universe,
whose knowledge is so immense, that this
being was able to create every atom, every
heavenly body, and every living creature of
the universe. Unfortunately, this is the only
concept-word that we have so far, as people did
NOT develop yet a similar word which would
be appropriate to describe God. Therefore,
in order to describe God I use the modified
term "relative imperfection". This modified
terminology does NOT mean at all that God is imperfect -
in the same way as imperfect can be some
people. It only means that the knowledge of
God still is subjected to improvements as time
elapses. Therefore, if this knowledge is estimated
in comparison (i.e. "relative") to the knowledge
of God, estimated - let's say, after another million
years have elapsed, then it is going to turn out
that the knowledge of God was increased in the
meantime. In other words, this "relative imperfection"
means, that if we compare God to man, or even
to all people taken together, than God is going to
turn out infinitively more "perfect" than people.
But if the same God in the state of His knowledge
from today, we compare to this God in the state
of His knowledge that is to appear after, let's say,
one million of years, then it is going to turn out
that today God is "relatively imperfect". The
consequence of this "relative imperfection" of
God is the need that God continually increases
His knowledge.
2.
A kind of knowledge that God does NOT know yet.
If we try to describe what God already knows, then
our list would be infinitively long, and probably still
would miss various vital items. Even if we describe
only what God knows in addition (and above) to
what is known to all people taken together, still the
knowledge listed e.g. in the Biblical "Job" 38:4-27
would turn out to be a small droplet in a huge
ocean. So in general we could state that
God knows everything
about which He is aware that it can be known.
In other words, "God does NOT know only this
knowledge, about which He still does NOT know
that it can be learned". But in order to learn "what
He still does NOT know", God needs someone to
realise to Him that this something can also be
learned. This function of "hinters what God
still does NOT know" is to be performed by people.
It is just for this purpose that God created people,
so the humans would keep realising to Him what He still
does NOT know. In turn when people hint to God
(usually in an unaware manner - means just by a
"pure coincidence") that He still does NOT know
something, then God finds methods and manners
to learn this. So after certain time elapses God
already begins to know it. Such a process of
hinting to God that something requires learning,
and subsequent learning this by God, is continuous.
In this manner, due to the inspiring functions of
people, God continually increases His knowledge.
3.
The human knowledge about "modelling and simulation".
Another group of confirmations that "God really
created the man to be able to increase His knowledge -
especially the knowledge about Himself", are
findings of human scientists on the subject of
so-called "experimental modelling and simulation".
Namely, if people wants to learn exactly attributes
of an object, then typically they make so-called
"model" of this object, then they "simulate" various
situations to which this real object is (or is going
to be) subjected in the real life. Then people watch
how this "model" behaves in subsequent kinds of
such simulated situations. From the real life we
know jolly well, that "the most difficult is to get to
know oneself". So if we relate the above to God,
then it becomes apparent that God wants to learn
well about Himself, but is aware that getting to know
oneself is extremely difficult. Therefore God created
man as a kind of "model" for Himself - means created
man "on his image and similarity". In turn now He
subjects this "model of Himself" to various simulated
situations, in order to be able to get to know Himself
better.
4.
Statements of the Bible. As this was explained in
the totaliztic web page
bible.htm - about mysteries of the Bible authorised by God Himself,
the Bible is a kind of "autobiography" which God gave
to people so that people could get to know Him better.
In this "autobiography" God indirectly confirms that
in fact the reason for which He created man is knowledge -
especially learning by God about Himself. Verses
in the Bible, in which God confirms this fact,
are Acts 17: 24-25, quote: "The God who
made the world and all things in it, since
He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not
dwell in temples made with hands. Neither
is He served by human hands, as though
He needed anything, since He Himself gives
to all life and breath and all things." Expressing
the essence of the above quotation in other
words, God does NOT need anything material
from people, but otherwise, it is Him who gives
to people everything that humans need. But
because God needed to have a reason for
which He created man, this reason is a
different kind than gaining temples or other
material goods from people. What is this
reason, God indirectly suggests this in another
place of the Bible, namely in "Genesis" 1:27
God states, quote: "So God created human
beings, making them to be like Himself, He
created them male and female." So if we
translate this verse into present scientific
language, it turns out that God created a
"model of Himself" in the form of man. In
turn the only reason for which an intelligent
being creates "models", is to learn the behaviour
of these models in specific situations, and
later deducing from the behaviours of these
models, how behaves the object which is
represented and reflected by these models.
So the model of God in the form of "man"
is to serve God for a better learning mechanisms
that rule over the behaviour of God Himself.
5.
Extrapolation of Wiśniewski regularities.
Almost everything that is slightly more complex,
God formed into kinds of pyramidal structures
and organisations. Examples of these include
the so-called "periodic table of the elements" -
and the composition of subsequent chemical
elements illustrated by this table, or the so-called
"Cyclic Table" described in chapter B from
monograph no 2 from the series
[1/5] -
and regularities in the development of propulsion
systems that are illustrated by this table. Various
regularities which are embedded into such pyramidal
structures already were noticed and utilised by
numerous researchers - including into this number
also a researcher of the Polish origin, named Wiśniewski.
This Wiśniewski noticed that there is a high regularity
with which every higher level of existence "nourishes itself"
with products earned by a lower than itself level of
existence. For example, us people have the opportunity
to watch in action on everyday basis as many as
3 different levels of existence that surrounds us.
These are (1) chemical elements from which our
planet is composed, (2) the world of vegetation,
and (3) the world of animals and people. Also as
we know, each lower of these levels of existence
is unable to notice the existence of the level that
is higher than itself. For example, chemical elements
(1) are unaware of the existence of vegetation (2),
in turn vegetation (2) are unaware of the existence
of animals and people (3). But chemical elements
(1) form various compounds and substances which
later are "eaten" by vegetation (2). In turn these
vegetation (2) form various complex organic compounds
which subsequently are "eaten" by animals and people
(3). So if the above regularity we extrapolate further,
then it indicates that also animals and people (3)
earn something - that is later "eaten" by some higher
level of existence which neither animals nor people
are able to notice. Of course, this higher level of
existence is God. In turn the only product which
God is able to allegorically "eat" is the knowledge
which people and animals generate during their lives.
Everything else, apart from the knowledge, God
is able to generate Himself, so in order to acquire
it He does NOT need to create people nor animals.
In order to summarise the above, although the
extrapolation described here is explained with the
use of rather simplistic terminology and deductions,
still it additionally confirms with the logical proof the
findings of the philosophy of totalizm discussed here
that "God created people in order to more effectively
increase His knowledge".
6.
NDE - "Near-Death Experience". In a significant
proportion of so-called "Near-Death Experience", people
who went through the clinical death describe their meeting
and discussion with God - Who after the death shows
Himself usually in the form of a beam of light. In this
first talk to a dying person God almost always stresses
the importance and significance of learning and accumulating
knowledge. Reports which reveal this significance which
God places on knowledge, are contained in practically
every book that describes "Near-Death Experience".
Thus from these reports clearly stems that for God the
increase of knowledge is the most vital reason for which
He created people.
7.
Situations and experiences to which people are subjected.
If one analyses thoroughly what happens to individual
people, then it always turns out that many situations
and experiences to which specific people are subjected,
are NOT fruiting with anything beneficial for them. So
these situations and experiences God probably "simulates",
amongst others, also in order to get to know Himself better.
Examples of these include: mosquitoes and other blood-sucking
creatures, suffering, wars, depriving people the certainty
that God does exist, cheating on people, stupid political
leaders, persecutions, so-called "curse of inventors"
described in items #G1 to #G3 of the web page
eco_cars.htm - about pollution free cars,
and in item #K3 of the web page
fe_cell.htm - about telekinetic cells,
and many others. In fact if these experiences do
NOT exist, the humanity still would develop and
increase its knowledge - sometimes even faster
that presently (especially with the existence
of the "curse of inventors", stupid leaders, or
mosquitoes). This is because the majority of
destructive experiences does NOT teach
people anything! (As a perfect example for this
consider "wars" which people carry out from
the beginnings of time and still did NOT learn
anything from them.) It is known that everything
that happens to people God controls with an
"iron hand". So if we consider more thoroughly
these destructive situations and experience, if
God eliminates them completely, then it would
have only beneficial for people consequences.
This in turn means, that such destructive situations
and experience are served to people by God not
for the good of these people, but mainly because
God wants to learn something from them.
* * *
From the practice we know, that if any intelligent
creature puts a lot of attention, work, and
troubles into something, then this creature
has vital reasons for doing this, which (reasons)
can be defined and described. It is known
that in order to create man, to give to people
religions and to teach them to seek knowledge
and to behave morally, to rule intentionally over
the fate of humanity, and finally to justly judge
lives of people, God puts in these a huge amount
of attention, work, and troubles. So it dopes NOT
require a genius to deduce, that God does all
these for some extremely vital reason. The
philosophy of totalizm
determined, that this reason is to "increase
knowledge". Of course, because e.g. the need
to "keep people in the lack of certainty about
the existence of God", as described in item
#F2 from the web page
evil.htm - about origins of all evil on the Earth,
and also because of several other reasons,
God Himself cannot appear on the sky and
explain to us that the increase of knowledge
is what He is after. Therefore, let us hope,
that the evidence and logical justifications
provided in this item, convinced the reader
that "seeking knowledge" is in fact the true
goal of all efforts of God. As this is going to
be explained in the next item below, the
awareness of this fact is able to transform
completely our lives.
#B5.
The present phase of gathering knowledge by God concerns "experimentation on evilness and consequences of it":
In spite of the complexity of God's intellect,
which allows God to complete billions of
different actions at the same time, still
empirical data indicate that in His efforts
to seek and to gather knowledge God
distinguishes separate periods and stages.
For example, in medieval times, very clear
period can be distinguished in which God
experimented with plagues on humans. In
turn in present times, clearly a period can
be distinguished when God experiments
with uncontrolled use of technical devices
by people. On the other hand, the entire
latest phase of God's experiments on the
Earth, which already lasts several thousand
of years, clearly depends on "experimenting
with evilness and the consequences of it". In
this concentration on carrying out experiments
with a clear subject area and a clear leading
idea, God is NOT different from human scientists.
After all, when human scientists carry out experiments
on any subject, then in order to minimize
influences of uncontrollable factors which differ
from factors just subjected to research, these scientists
also distinguish clear periods and stages of research,
and they also concentrate in each period and stage
on a thorough researching a single factor only.
There is a lot of evidence in support of the fact,
that our civilisation is just in the middle of phase
when God experiments on people with evilness
and with consequences of it. For example, God
indicates this fact even in the
Bible (which is a kind of "autobiography of God"),
letting people know in there that He temporally
gave to Satan the power over the Earth and
over people. This experimental phase is also
confirmed by numerous evil creatures which
God "simulates" on the Earth. (Such evil creatures
are described, amongst others, in chapter JJ
from volume 6 of the second edition of monograph
[8/2] "Totalizm".)
God's experiments concerning evilness are also
confirmed by the existence and action of a whole
array of experiences and phenomena that are NOT
needed for the development of people, for example
the existence of mosquitoes and wars described in
subsection JF5 of that volume 6 from monograph
[8/2],
or the existence of so-called "curse of inventors"
described in there in subsections JF3 and JG5.5.
Finally the experiments of God with evilness are
also confirmed by the present system of rewards
and punishments that God uses at people. God
serves these rewards and punishments to people
according to the so-called "method of carrot and
stick" - described in subsection JG5.2 of that volume
6 from monograph
[8/2],
and also mentioned in item #D1 of the web page
god.htm - about scientific answers of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions regarding God.
Namely, in the presently used by God version of
this "method of carrot and stick", God in a clear
way gives evident and immediately identifiable
rewards for immoral actions, while in the visible
and easily identifiable manner God punishes
mainly for moral actions.
Independently from this item, the "experimentation
on evilness and consequences of it" is also
discussed in subsection JF6 from volume 6 of monograph
[8/2].
#B5.1.
Intentional and repetitive subjecting people to painful and unpleasant experiences has
also another goal - namely grooming "hardened in fire" future companions of God:
There is a proverb in English stating "spare
the rod and spoil the child". This proverb
represents the translation into present language
of the method of God's acting which in the
Biblical
Book of Proverbs 13:24 God Himself expressed
with the words - quote (from NIV): "He who
spares the rod hates his son, but he who
loves him is careful to discipline him."
Therefore the present phase of gathering
knowledge by God with the use of "experimentation
on evilness and consequences of it" has also another,
equally important goal. Namely, God uses it
also as a method of "grooming" people into
righteous, hardened in fire, and reliable future
companions, through shaping in them desirable
attributes of character with intentional and repetitive
subjecting every person to various unpleasant
and painful experiences. The illustrative explanation
why it is necessary to subject people to such
a "hardening of character", is provided in item
#A3 from the totaliztic web page
god_proof.htm.
Notice that the method of "hardening character
of people" implemented by God through intentional
and repetitive subjecting each person to various
painful and unpleasant experiences, is also
described in item #K2 from the totaliztic web page
soul_proof.htm - about scientific evidence for the existence of souls.
The Bible puts a significant emphasis on the
primary educational principle that the "character
of people should be shaped like we harden steel".
This principle is repeated in the Bible in many
places. For example, apart from the verse quoted
before, in the Biblical Book of Proverbs it is also
repeated e.g. in verses 19:18 (quote: "Discipline
your children while they are young enough to
learn. If you don't, you are helping them destroy
themselves."), 22:15 (quote: "Children just
naturally do silly, careless things, but a good
spanking will teach them how to behave."),
23:13 (quote: "Don't hesitate to discipline a child.
A good spanking won't kill him. As a matter
of fact, it may save his life."), or 29:17
(quote: "Discipline your son and you can
always be proud of him. He will never give
you reason to be ashamed"). It is also
repeated in the book of Ecclesiasticus
(note - do NOT confuse it with the different
book of Ecclesiastes), chapter 30, verse 1
(quote from the New Jerusalem Bible: "Whoever
loves his son will beat him frequently so that
in after years the son may be his comfort.").
This principle proven its correctness during
centuries of applying it. Unfortunately, some
dark forces started recently to undermine the
competence of God in the educational principle
which God recommends in His Bible and which
is discussed here. Even more strangely, various
humans, and sometimes also some parents, in
their blindness started lately openly persecute
this principle and make it illegal in the light of
human law. In this way they create on purpose
the situation, that human laws go exactly against God's laws,
and that these people who act accordingly to
God's laws are severely punished by human laws.
For example, in New Zealand the parliament
introduced so-called "anti-smacking
law" which declares a criminal every parent
which gives a smack his or her child. What
is the most strange, that teaching parents by
the government how they should bring up
their children, takes a new dimension in the
light of a television programme entitled "60 minutes"
broadcasted in channel 3 of television New
Zealand, on Monday, 20 July 2009, at 7:30 pm
till 8:30 pm. According to this program, State
Agencies from New Zealand which supposed
to care for orphans and children taken from
their parents, were accused of the largest in
the history of this country abuse of children.
The program informed, that at the time it was
filmed already around 5000 of former children
from the State Care Institutions started the court
proceedings regarding the matter of their former
abuse, while the total number of children abused
in State Care Institutions can reach even as much
as 50000. Thus it should be at least suprising, that
while NOT preventing the abuse of children in the
institutions managed by the state, the same state
feels competent to instruct parents and to issue
laws which are to punish parents who try to
discipline their children in own homes.
In the result of implementing this "anti-smacking law",
New Zealand started to experience educational problems
and increase of crime of the cosmic proportions.
The matter went so far, that in order to force
the government to invalidate this law, concerned
citizens pushed to a country-wide referendum
on 1 to 20 August 2009, which (the
referendum) asks every citizen the question
"Should a smack as part of good parental
correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?"
Although the cost of this referendum climbed to
around 9 millions of dollars, the government in
advance stated that is NOT going to take any
notice of the outcomes of it and does not
intend to change this law. Yet simultaneously
in almost every newspaper which I took to hand
during the preparations to this referendum, I saw
at least one article which directly or indirectly
tried to convince readers to vote YES (i.e. to
vote in favour of keeping this law imposed on the
society by the parliament and making a criminal
from every parent that serves a smack to his or
her child), or at least convince the readers to NOT
take part in voting at all. Simultaneously I did NOT
meet even a single article which would argue to
vote NO - means to vote against keeping this law
in power any further. An example of the article
which argued to vote YES, was the article entitled
"The Bible has harsh views on rearing a child",
from page B5 of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Saturday, July 11, 2009.
Parents which give smacks to their children this
article compares to biblical fundamentalists.
(In order to realise what mental links can be
induced in readers by comparing someone
to biblical fundamentalists, it is enough to
mention here that these ones who are accused
of terrorist attacks and bombing of WTC
typically are called religious fundamentalists.) The
article also suggests indirectly that accusing to be
criminals all people who discipline their children with
smacks would be "a more enlightened way forward".
Further data regarding this intriguing referendum
and regarding the anti-smacking law that it tries
to abolish is provided, amongst others, in articles
"Get cracking on referendum act"
from page A4 of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Friday, June 19, 2009, and
"Three out of four think poll waste of money"
from page A4 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Monday, June 29, 2009.
The referendum finished on Thursday,
20 August 2009. The outcomes of it were
published, amongst others, in the article
"You say Change the law, PM says No I want"
from page A1 of newspaper
Weekend - The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Saturday-Sunday, August 22-23,
2009. Overwhelming majority of people, because
87.60% voted NO (means requested to change
the law). Only 11.81% of people voted YES (means
keep the existing anti-smacking law). Turnaout in
this referendum was 54.64% (i.e. voted 1,622,000
New Zealanders) - this means against the law voted
more citizens than the total number of citizens who
took part in the governmental elections which preceded
that referendum. The cost of referendum was NZ$ 8.9
millions - but the government still ignored outcomes
of it and still refused to abolish that widely disapproved
law. In fact, the article entitled "Mother jailed for beating
son with hose" from page A1 of the newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Friday, November 20, 2009, describes
a shocking severity with which after the referendum
parents that tried to discipline their children still were
punished in this democratic country. The article
describes a case of a mother which served into her
son's bottom 15 whacks with a watering hose, because
son was chronically truant from the school. For
this whacking she was jailed for 15 months (means
the New Zealand justice served her one month
of jail for each whack of her son's bottom with
a hose). Several further cases when parents
were punished by courts because they tried to
discipline their rampaging brats, is described
in the article "Latta gives OK to anti-smacking
law" from page A1 of the New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Tuesday, December 8, 2009.
For my best knowledge, in other place and time
almost each one amongst these cases would finish
with placing these rampaging brats in a court, not
in sentencing their parents. Also parents of these
cases emphasized in a different article "Parents
hit back over smacking" (from page A13 of the
New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post -
issue dated on Saturday, December 19, 2009),
that they were ignored in this "one-sided report"
and that the report contains glaring errors. Yet
in New Zealand the especially arranged governmental
review announced on the base of these cases that
the anti-smacking law is working as intended and
there is no need to change the law.
In another article "It's okay to give
light smacks, says PM" from page A1 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue also dated on Tuesday, December 8, 2009,
this announcement of outcomes of the review
was declared by the anti-law campaigners as
the "government-funded sales pitch". The need
for introducing the anti-smacking law, politicians
of New Zealand most frequently justify by the
supposed need to protect children from abuse
by adults. But as this was revealed by outcomes
of research published in the article "Outcry
fails to reduce child abuse deaths" from page
A7 of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Thursday, December 10, 2009,
statistics of numbers of deaths of children caused
by abuse by adults remain after the introduction of
anti-smacking law the same as before this introduction.
Thus, the statistics indicate, that the law does
NOT prevent children against deaths from abusive
adults.
More information about grooming in people the
desirable attributes of character in the "hard way"
is provided in subsections D2 and D1 from volume 2 of monograph
[8/2] entitled "Totalizm".
#B6.
From thoughtless servants, into aware partners of God:
Motto:
"If you learned
totalizm
thoroughly, then you should stop
think of yourself as a 'servant and
slave of God', but start to consider
yourself to be a 'partner of God in
His searches for knowledge'."
Very meaningful is the content of quotation
provided in 3 from the previous item #B4 of
this web page. This Biblical quotation from
Acts 17: 24-25 states that "The God who
made the world and all things in it, since
He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not
dwell in temples made with hands. Neither
is He served by human hands, as though
He needed anything, since He Himself gives
to all life and breath and all things." In other
words, God does NOT want that people
are to what they are persuaded by present
religions - namely "thoughtless servants of
people who claim to act in the name of God".
God actually wants that people become aware
partners and associates of God in the process
of "gathering knowledge". Amongst others,
this is also why God did NOT stated in the
Bible any explaination why He created people.
He wants that people get the idea all by
themselves and all by themselves begin
voluntarily such a "gathering of knowledge".
After all, if God explained this clearly and openly
in the Bible and thus enforced this in people
with the use of religions which He created,
then the "search for knowledge" would also
become another manifestation amongst numerous
ways of thoughtless services to God. However,
the thoughtless serving and slavery is unable
to generate some kinds of knowledge. (For
example, someone who considers himself
or herself to be a servant and a slave of God
never would be able to formulate the
philosophy of totalizm
nor the theory of everything called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.)
Therefore God wants that people which believe
in Him went now into a next (higher) phase of
their existence, when from a thoughtless servants
and slaves of God they transform into aware
partners and associates in gathering knowledge
for the good of the entire intelligent universe.
Totalizm is just a philosophy which opens for
people the possibility to carry out this freeing
transformation.
In other words, totalizm tries to explain to us that
just right now a time has started when we people
have the opportunity to get through an extremely
vital "transformation of awareness" and become
kinds of "partners" of God. Means, we do NOT
need to remain any further His thoughtless servants,
who are just to obey His will and to "recite" countless
rosaries in His adoration. We can become now
aware partners and associates of God in the
mutual effort of ourselves and God to seek and
gather knowledge. In turn as such "partners",
we begin to mutually influence each other,
and mutually shape our common future. Thus,
after completing the "transformation of awareness"
described here, NOT only God still shapes our
future, but also us people begin the partnership
in shaping the future of God. However, in order
to be able to fulfil better our function as "partners
of God", it is required that we people begin to
be aware of our true function and role as such
partners of God. In turn the first step towards
this direction is the voluntary learning of the
philosophy of totalizm,
and - if we have such capabilities and intellectual
inclinations, also learning a bit more difficult
than totalizm
the theory of everything called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
These new disciplines of knowledge allow us
that the to-date belief in God we replace
in our awareness with the thorough knowledge
of God. I hope that by formulating these
descriptions here I added my contribution towards
effective growth of such awareness in all of us.
Practically our transformation from servants into
partners of God, depends on shaking out our
prejudices to-date, on change in our manner
of thinking, and on adopting the intellectual
activeness. After all, in order to become a
"partner of God" in the process of increase
of knowledge, we are NOT allowed to ignore
or leave-out anything in our considerations -
because it could offend someone, nor we are
allowed to take anything just "on faith" - as
so-far it was done by religious people. Thus,
although findings of the
philosophy of totalizm and the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
make us sure that God does exist and sure
that it is God that stands behind everything
that happens around us, still we have a duty to
think logically and to seek knowledge without
any prejudices nor hindering - means with
use of the same principles and methods that
so-far were utilised mainly by so-called "atheistic
scientists". In other words, we need to begin the
active search for knowledge, become satisfied
NOT only by knowing "who" (i.e. God), but also
seek the knowledge "how", "why", "when", etc.
We need to consider every option i possibility,
find answers to every question, and compare
each reply we have with the reality that surrounds
us - in order to determine the extend to which
this reply is true. For example, religious people
NEVER would have the courage to seek answer
to the question "are Satan and devils just negative
poles of God's personality which balance His
positive attributes, in the same way as a 'minus'
is the pole of every battery which balances a
'plus' of this battery?" After all, religious people
would feel fear, prejudice, and hinder against
honest asking of this type of questions. On the
other hand, if one wants to get to know God
and to become His aware partner in seeking the
knowledge, then one needs to have the courage
to ask such questions with good intentions, while
after getting answer to them - also the courage
to compare this answer with the reality that
surrounds us.
Probably I do NOT need to explain here consequences
of someone volunteering for carrying out in himself
or herself this "transformation of awareness" inspired
in people by findings of the
philosophy of totalizm
(i.e. the transformation from thoughtless "servants"
into aware "partners" of God). After all, if one places
himself or herself in the position of God, then it
becomes absolutely certain that it is impossible to
treat the same an aware partner, as one treats a
thoughtless servant. I should mention here, that
since the time when in my awareness I voluntarily
went through this transformation, then immediately
I started to feel a different treatment from God.
#B7.
Whether researchers of God commit blasphemy:
As we know, some religious people rush to
accuse of blasphemy of everyone who
researches or disseminates truths regarding
God - if these truths even slightly differ from
dogmas of their religion. These types of
accusations were a major occupation of
medieval Inquisition. They were also a kind
of scarecrow which was used by priests of
practically all religions. As this is documented
in the Biblical Evangel of St. Matthew, 26:65,
even Jesus Himself was accused of blasphemy
by Jewish priests and condemned to death.
Of course, in the entire history of the humanity
no-one has existed that would be more far from
intensions of blasphemy than Jesus Himself.
For this reason, it is worth to realise, that
researching God, and also investigating and
disseminating truths regarding God, never is
a blasphemy, nor ever can become a blasphemy.
After all, the very nature of researching and
seeking truths is such, that the researcher
must ask questions which no-one asked before
for some reasons. In turn, just asking questions
which earlier were not articulated, nor finding
answers for these questions, cannot become
a blasphemy - no matter what these questions
try to establish. (What really represents a
blasphemy, it is defined in the Bible quite well -
e.g. see Leviticus 24:15 "Anyone who
curses God, must suffer the consequences ...".)
If we analyse the world around us, then we can
discover that God intentionally motivates and
inspires us to ask difficult questions about Him.
After all, if God does NOT want us to ask such
questions and seek answers to them, then He
would create our world and our history in a
completely different manner. Thus, e.g. the
fact that Jesus was born from the Virgin Mary,
instead of e.g. being lowered down from the
heaven in thunders and lightings, means that
God wants us to research the matter of virgin
birth and the ability to initiate life remotely by God.
In turn e.g. the fact that in the Bible the age of
the universe is defined by God at just around
6000 years, while the same God so created the
fossils of dinosaurs, geological layers, and galaxies,
that contradictory to His Bible they suggest the
age of the universe amounting to around 14
billion years - for details see item #A2 from
the totaliztic web page
evolution.htm,
in reality also means that God wants to inspire us
to ask questions regarding the truth of claims of
the Bible and the true age of the universe. Similarly,
claiming in all religions of the world - as this is
explained in item #C6 from the totaliztic web page
prawda_uk.htm,
that it was God who created the universe, but
simultaneously creating the universe by the same
God is such a manner that it displays evidence
which supposedly suggests that the universe
originates from the so-called "big bang", also
clearly is intended by God to induce searches
for truth in humans and to inspire humans to
discuss this matter. Etc., etc. In other words,
both, the Bible and the products of a huge
number of God's actions, continually try to
reassure us that these ones who research
God and seek truths about God, do exactly what
God wants that people do. In turn researching
according to intentions of God, never can become
a blasphemy - no matter what questions are
formulated for working theses of this research.
Part #C:
Manners and methods with the use of which
God
tries to accomplish His goals:
#C1.
The historic review of manners that God utilises for controlling over actions and views of people:
According to explanations provided on
a separate web page
bible.htm - about mysteries of the Bible authorised by God Himself,
in history of the humanity to-date God
tried in action two different groups of methods
of governing over the people. Each of these
two methods of governing people by God
is described in a separate part of the Bible,
i.e. the first in described in the "Old Testament",
while the second one in the "New Testament".
In the first amongst these two groups of methods
God in person tried to directly induce the moral,
technical, and scientific progress of humanity
through projecting Himself into temporary created
human-like bodies which simulated His presence
amongst people. Because God is able to link
His mind simultaneously to any number of such
simulated human-like bodies, this first method of
governing over people boiled down to sending to
the Earth like "gods" (means human-shaped
"ambassadors of God") that lived amongst people
of various tribes and nations. These "gods" taught
local "savages" the basis areas of science and
technology, as well as moral principles of behaviour.
They also initiated wars between nations that
they taught and neighbours of these nations.
Such wars performed several functions. For
example, they provided people with motivations
to learn from these "gods" through demonstrating
to people the direct link between the learned
knowledge and morality and benefits of winning
with given neighbourly nations. They also
reinforced in people understanding to principles
of confrontation and competition, through
realising a simple truth that "the more you learn
and the more you work, the higher chance you
get to wing with your enemies in any confrontation".
In addition, the efficiency of subsequent methods
of action of these "gods" was compared with the
use of such wars and was verified in practice.
Another group of methods of governing used by
God for controlling people was introduced on the
Earth at the moment of appearing of Jesus and
then Christianity. In the
Bible
it is represented by the content of the New
Testament. The characteristic attribute of it is that
God
ceased to openly (i.e. noticeably to people) intervene
into human matters, and started to increasingly
wide implementation of the "canon of ambiguity"
in everything that He does. According to this
canon God ceased to send His ambassadors
(means "gods") to people. In turn when He was
forced to send someone to people, then instead
"gods" He just delegated His "curriers", means
"angels", or simulations of His adversaries (which
He also temporally created, and minds of which
He also fully controlled), means "devils".
Simultaneously God improved and extended His
methods of competition and confrontation between
subsequent groups of people as methods of motivating
the progress. These methods started to be based
NOT only on the competition between subsequent
tribes and nations, but also on ambitions of singular
leaders and rebels, on religion adhered, on access
to resources and to communication routes, etc., etc.
#C2.
The "canon of ambiguity", "free will", and other constraints which at present times limit methods of God:
A path to any goal never is simple. This is
because always on this path various obstacles
appear, which force to walk around them.
As it turns out, various limitations apply also
to even God Himself. The most commonly
known of these limitations include the so-called
"free will", and the so-called "canon of ambiguity".
What even more interesting, both these limitations
God voluntarily imposed on Himself. This in turn
means, that in order to tolerate such limitations,
God needed to have an extremely important
reason for introducing them. This reason is
already explained in item #B1 above.
The "canon of ambiguity" states the following:
in the universe nothing can be fully unambiguous
and deprived sources of all doubts, because
then the people who confront it would be
deprived the right to their own free will and
the right to choose their own views and the
path through the life.
Independently from this item, the "canon of
ambiguity" is also discussed on several other
totaliztic web pages, for example in item #B9
of the web page
god.htm - about scientific answers of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions about God,
in item #I1 of the web page
god_proof.htm - about scientific proofs for the existence of God,
in item #B2 of the web page
soul_proof.htm - about scientific proofs for the existence of immortal soul,
and at the beginning of part #F from the web page
bible.htm - about mysteries of the Bible authorised by God Himself.
But the most comprehensive presentation of
this canon is provided in subsection JB7.4
from volume 7 of monograph
[1/4].
#C3.
Present "people who believe in God" - their contribution to morality with simultaneous
failing to carry out intellectual and technical development of humanity:
Motto:
Present believers only "worship God",
while God in fact requires that people
research Him scientifically and they
pedantically obey laws which God
established and which people are to
learn due to rational researching God.
(This item is in the process of writing.
The completion of it will be continued.
Please come again and see it a bit later.)
#C4.
Present "atheists" - their contribution to the development of knowledge
and technology with the simultaneous causing the moral fall down of humanity:
Motto:
Present atheists believe that since the evidence
of punishments for immoral behaviours does
NOT hit people in the eyes, everyone is
excused to act immorally. However, "moral laws"
cause that all immoral behaviours are punished
independently whether these behaviours are
carried out by atheists or by believers in God.
(This item is in the process of writing.
The completion of it will be continued.
Please come again and see it a bit later.)
#C5.
The God's "ideal of man" - i.e. morally behaving researcher of the universe which
believes in God but still intensely pursues knowledge and implements technical progress:
Na bazie dotychczasowych ustaleń co do
faktycznych intencji Boga dosyć klarownie
wyłania sie obraz, jak w oczach Boga
wyglądałby "ideał człowieka". Jak się
okazuje ów ideał człowieka kierowałby
całą swoją energię na gromadzenie wiedzy
i na podnoszenie poziomu technicznego
ludzkości, ale równocześnie w swoim życiu
postępowałby pedantycznie moralnie i
wykazywałby przekonanie i pewność co do istnienia
Boga. Innymi słowy taki idealny człowiek
byłby jakby uosobieniem unaukowionej
moralności i wiary w Boga, wpieranej jednak
zrozumieniem że naczelnym celem
Boga jest właśnie podnoszenie wiedzy,
oraz zaochotniczeniem własnego wkładu
dla szybszego osiągania owego celu Boga.
Stąd na przekór że ów idealny w oczach
Boga człowiek byłby wierzący, wcale nie
zamykałby się przed postępem, wiedzą i
poznaniem - tak jak to czynią dotychczasowi
wierzący, a badałby wszechświat i Boga tak
jak to czynią dotychczasowi ateiści, oraz
usilnie dzwigałby do góry poziom cywilizacyjny
ludzkości. Znaczy, wcale NIE zadowalałby
się znajomością odpowiedzi na pytanie "kto"
(tj. Bóg), ale także poszukiwałby odpowiedzi
na równie ważne pytania "jak", "dlaczego",
"kiedy", "jakie dowody to potwierdzają",
"jaka lekcja z tego dla nas wynika", "jak
to daje się wykorzystać przez ludzkość",
itd., itp.
Na przekór iż z biegiem czasu ludzie wierzący
zapewne będą się zbliżali do tego boskiego
"ideału człowieka", Bóg wcale nie odbierze
ludziom "wolnej woli", ani zapewne nie zaniecha
przestrzegania "kanonu niejednoznaczności".
Dlatego niezależnie od owych "idealnych ludzi",
na świecie nadal będą istnieli "ateiści". Można
więc również wydedukować, jak w oczach Boga
wygląda taki "idealny ateista". Jak łatwo wydedukować,
taki idealny ateista poszukiwałby ateistycznej
wiedzy na temat wszechświata - tak jak to czyni
obecnie, jednak równocześnie uznawałby że
niezależnie od praw fizycznych, działalnością
ludzi rządzą również tzw "prawa moralne".
Innymi słowy, taki "idealny ateista" tym różniłby
się od dzisiejszego ateisty, że we wszystkim co
by czynił też postępowałby pedantycznie moralnie
poprzez świadome przestrzeganie "praw moralnych"
w swoim życiu. Jedyne więc co idealnego ateistę
różniłoby od opisanego wcześniej "idealnego
człowieka", to że nie uznawałby istnienia Boga
zaś "prawa moralne" uważałby za odmianę
praw natury, zamiast jak ludzie wierzący - za prawa
narzucane ludziom do wypełniania przez Boga.
Czytający zapewne zadaje sobie pytanie, czy
istnieje jakiś materiał dowodowy że powyższy
obraz "idealnego człowieka" oraz "idealnego
ateisty" faktycznie jest zgodny z intencjami
Boga. Aczkolwiek wobec działania "kanonu
niejednoznaczności" ogromnie trudno "wypytać"
Boga jakie są jego intencje w tym zakresie,
ciągle istnieją pośrednie potwierdzenia, że
Bóg popiera takie właśnie charakterystyki
ludzi. Jednym z owych pośrednich potwierdzeń
jest "błogosławieństwo twórczości" którym Bóg
obdziela każdego wierzącego który nie zamyka
się przed wiedzą i postępem - tak jak czynią
to typowi ludzie wierzący w Boga,
a moralnie poszukuje, bada, podnosi wiedzę,
oraz moralnie dokonuje postępu w imię wiary
w Boga. Jeśli bowiem przeanalizować życiorysy
wysoce twórczych ludzi, wówczas się okazuje że
niemal wszyscy oni byli otwartymi na wiedzę i
postęp wierzącymi w Boga. Tak nawiasem mówiąc,
to ja zaliczam także i siebie do owej grupy ludzi
silnie wierzących w Boga jednak równocześnie
poszukujących wiedzy o wszechświecie i wspierających
postęp. Osobiście też wierzę, że wszystkie moje
odkrycia i ustalenia opisane na całym szeregu
stron internetowych (np. patrz strona
o mnie (dr inż. Jan Pająk),
czy też strona
humanity_pl.htm - o lepszej ludzkości),
powstały właśnie dzięki poparciu Boga dla postawy
życiowej w której pedantyczna moralność i wiara w
Boga współistnieją w poszukiwaniu prawdy, wiedzy i
w popieraniu postępu.
#C6.
How in spite of the action of the "canon of ambiguity" God gradually implements His "ideal of man":
Rola konfrontacji i kompetycji.
Wymuszająca postęp rola zła (celowe stworzenie i wprowadzenie "diabłów").
Rola balansu pomiędzy ateistami i wierzącymi.
(This item is in the process of writing.
The completion of it will be continued.
Please come again and see it a bit later.)
#C7.
Notice that whatever is explained on this web page it does NOT run against the "canon of ambiguity":
(This item is in the process of writing.
The completion of it will be continued.
Please come again and see it a bit later.)
Part #D:
The situation in which the human civilisation find itself at the present moment:
#D1.
Let us name the situation by what it really is:
Motto:
We can learn morality either a hard way
by empirical experiences, or a pleasant
way through findings of the
moral philosophy of totalizm.
Kiedy rozglądamy się dookoła siebie
to sytuacja ludzi wcale nie budzi optymizmu.
Wojny, wzajemne zabijanie, okrucieństwa,
śmierć, galopujące ceny i inflacja, upadek
moralności, bezbożność, zniszczenie
środowiska, itd., itp. Czyżby więc nadeszły
na Ziemię owe czasy
bibilijnych.
Jeźdźców Apokalipsy? Wielu z nas zachodzi
w głowę dlaczego Bóg nie interweniuje.
(This item is in the process of writing.
The completion of it will be continued.
Please come again and see it a bit later.)
#D2.
The common understanding of the present situation of people and the folklore descriptions of this situation:
In 2007 in the Internet a brief email was
disseminated, which in my opinion perfectly
reflects human feelings about the present
situation of the humanity. Below I am repeating
the text of this email in two language versions
(i.e. in English and Polish):
THE PARADOX OF OUR AGE:
We spend more, but we have less, we buy more, but enjoy less.
We have bigger houses and smaller families, more conveniences, but less time.
We have more degrees, but less sense, more knowledge, but less judgement, more experts, but more problems, more medicine, but less wellness.
We drink too much, smoke too much, spend too recklessly, laugh too little, drive too fast, get too angry too quickly, stay up too late, get up too tired, pray too seldom, and watch too much TV.
We have multiplied our possessions, but reduced our values.
We've learned how to make a living but not a life.
PARADOKS NASZYCH CZASÓW:
Wydajemy więcej, jednak mamy mniej, kupujemy więcej, jednak cieszy nas to mniej.
Mamy większe domy i mniejsze rodziny, więcej wygód, ale mniej czasu.
Mamy więcej dyplomów, ale mniej sensu, więcej wiedzy, jednak mniej właściwej oceny, więcej ekspertów, jednak więcej problemów, więcej lekarstw jednak mniej zdrowia.
Pijemy zbyt wiele, palimy zbyt mocno, wydajemy niedbale, śmiejemy się zbyt rzadko, jeździmy zbyt szybko, wpadamy w gniew zbyt łatwo, zostajemy zbyt długo, wstajemy zbyt zmęczeni, modlimy się zbyt rzadko, ogladamy telewizję zbyt często.
Posiadliśmy wiele na własność, jednak zredukowaliśmy swoje wartości.
Nauczyliśmy się jak utrzymywać się przy życiu, jednak nie wiemy jak żyć.
(This item is in the process of writing.
The completion of it will be continued.
Please come again and see it a bit later.)
#D3.
The implementation of intentions of God regarding the restaration of balance - means where the humanity is just going:
Motto:
"There are no atheists amongst frightened" and "when it thunders, the thief becomes honest" and "the devil was sick, the devil a monk would be".
(This item is in the process of writing.
The completion of it will be continued.
Please come again and see it a bit later.)
Part #E:
How us people can assit in the restoration of balance and in the reversal of present tendention to destroy:
#E1.
The common understanding of the intentions of God and meeting these intentions a half way:
Wzajemna tolerancja wierzących i niewierzących oraz lepsze zrozumienie swoich ról w rozwoju wszechświata.
Bazowanie postępu wiedzy na obu wyjściowych punktach widzenia (tj. "instnienia Boga" oraz "nieistnienia Boga").
Zamienienie "niemoralnego ateizmu" na "tolerancyjny sceptycyzm".
Nawrót do moralnego postępowania.
(This item is in the process of writing.
The completion of it will be continued.
Please come again and see it a bit later.)
#E2.
How the human civilisation is to look-like after the intentions of God are fulfilled - let us assist in a fast implementation this state:
(This item is in the process of writing.
The completion of it will be continued.
Please come again and see it a bit later.)
Part #F:
Summary, and the final information of this web page:
#F1.
Summary of this web page:
As the reader probably is aware of this, myself
(means
the author of this web page - Dr Eng. Jan Pajak)
I am the scientists who is absolutly sure of the
existence of God. It is this being absolutely
sure caused that on this web page I decided
to simulate goals, intentions, and methods of
action of God.
W wyniku owej symulacji
okazało się, że pogarszająca się obecnie
sytuacja ludzkości posiada swoje powody
i zamiary. Mianowicie, wszystko wskazuje
na to że Bóg za pomocą obecnej zmiany
warunków na Ziemi stara się osiągnąć
przewartościowanie stanowisk ludzi. A
więc przykładowo dotychczasowe "uwielbianie
Boga" przez ludzi wierzących, Bóg stara
się przetransformować w "badanie Boga
oraz wypełnianie praw boskich". Z kolei
dotychczasowe "pogłębianie niemoralnego
postępu" przez ateistów, Bóg stara się
przetransformować w "moralne wykuwanie
postępu".
Z niniejszego symulacyjnego ujawnienia
celów, intencji, oraz metod działania Boga
wynika dla nas możliwość ochotniczego
i dobrowolnego dopełnienia przez ludzi
owej transformacji którą Bóg rozpoczął
już nam natrzucać siłą. Wszakże jeśli
dokonamy owej transformacji ochotniczo,
wówczas zaoszczędzi to nam wielu męk i
upadków. Aby zaś ochotniczo dokonać
wymaganej transformacji, wystarczy aby
we wszystkim co się czyni zacząc uwzględniać
intencje Boga, aby zacząć działać tak jak
the
philosophy of totalizm
nam to nakazuje (czyli zawsze pedantycznie
moralnie), oraz aby w naszych opracowaniach
naukowych niezależnie od ateistycznego punktu
widzenia zacząć w końcu prezentować jak dana
sprawa wygląda w sytuacji istnienia Boga.
#F2.
Blogs of totalizm:
It is also worth to check
periodically the blog of
totalizm available under several address, e.g.:
totalizm.wordpress.com,
totalizm.blox.pl/html,
and
newfreehost.com/god.
(Notice that all these addresses hold the same
blog with the same content of messages.)
On this blog many matters discussed here are also explained with
additional details written as new events unveil before our eyes.
These readers who wish to discuss any
aspect that is addressed on this web page
will be pleased to know that public
discussions of almost all topic that
I researched currently, including many of
my devices and inventions, are carried out
in the Internet for a long time. Addresses of
subsequent threads in the Google discussion
groups, where these topics are exposed to
public comments, are listed in item #E2 of
the totaliztic web page
faq.htm.
Readers who have constructive comments
about any matters relating to my research
and inventions, are encouraged to find
addresses of these Google threads from
item #E2 of that web page "faq.htm",
and then voice their constructive opinions
at these addresses.
#F5.
Contact details to the
author
of this web page:
Current email addresses of the author of this web page, i.e.
Dr Eng. Jan Pajak
(while for the duration of 2007 - Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak),
at which readers can post possible comments,
inquiries, or replies to questions which I ask on
my web pages, are provided on the web page
about me (Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak).
That page also provides my postal address
and telephone numbers.
Please notice, that because of the chronic lack
of time, I reluctantly reply to emails which
contain ONLY time consuming requests,
while simultaneously document a complete
ignorance of their authors in the subject area
which I am researching. Therefore, is someone
sends me a request, I suggest to place in P.S. to
his or her email a comment which documents
that in fact he or she took an effort to read my
web pages. The effect of such documenting of
interest can be accomplished e.g. by passing
an "exam" from the knowledge of some amongst
my web pages, means either by answering
questions attached to specific kinds of requests,
or by replying at least a single question from
the following general questions (please choose
the question depending on one's interests).
(1) How the "theory of everything" called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
explains the principle of operation of
telekinetic generators of free energy?
(2) How the so-called "time surges" (or
"waving of timespace") occur and what they cause
according to the descriptions from web pages about
time vehicles,
New Zealand, and about the
Tapanui explosion?
(3) What components would need to contain
the "amphora from Pakistan" in order to work continually
for many centuries in the manner described on this web
page?
* * *
If you prefer to read in Polish
click on the flag below
(Jeśli preferujesz czytanie w języku polskim
kliknij na poniższą flagę)
Date of starting this page: 18 April 2008.
Date of the latest updating of this page: 25 January 2010.
(Check in "Menu 3" whether there is even a more recent update!)
